From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-409718-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31045 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2012 15:03:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 30879 invoked by uid 55); 13 Dec 2012 15:02:57 -0000
From: "tejohnson at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/55674] [4.8 Regression] >20%  size increase of lto/pgo binaries since r193747
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tejohnson at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55674-4-VL2sKgHC0e@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg01326.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674

--- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google dot com> 2012-12-13 15:02:55 UTC ---
Ok, I will download tramp3d-v4 right now and see what is going on. Can
you send me the full set of options you are using to compile it?

Teresa

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:52 AM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
>
> --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> 2012-12-13 14:52:37 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #3)
>> Hi Markus,
>>
>> Are you sure you have my subsequent fixes patched in, to make sure the
>> histogram is getting streamed through the LTO files? This was the
>> behavior I saw when I was debugging the original issue that I fixed
>> with those patches. Basically, the hotness checks before we went into
>> LTO were good, and after LTO the min count was 0.
>>
> Hi Teresa,
>
> yes my gcc is up-to-date (from todays git).
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.