From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-410029-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29550 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2012 18:23:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 29475 invoked by uid 48); 16 Dec 2012 18:23:26 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55679] new asan tests from r194458 fail on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55679-4-CjWsUmXbfy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55679-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55679-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg01637.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55679

--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-12-16 18:23:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comments #12 and #13)
With -O1, the invalid tests c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c and
c-c++-common/asan/stack-overflow-1.c are optimized to a valid "return 0" as
shown by the following differences between the outputs of -dump-tree-optimized
with and without -fno-tree-fre:

--- stack-overflow-1.c.164t.optimized    2012-12-16 17:26:13.000000000 +0100
+++ stack-overflow-1.c.164t_f.optimized    2012-12-16 17:25:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -3,18 +3,14 @@

 main ()
 {
-  int res;
   char x[10];
   int ten.1;
-  char _4;

   <bb 2>:
   __builtin_memset (&x, 0, 10);
   ten.1_3 ={v} ten;
-  _4 = x[ten.1_3];
-  res_5 = (int) _4;
   x ={v} {CLOBBER};
-  return res_5;
+  return 0;

 }

So the problem for these two tests has nothing to do with asan. Note that they
regress cleanly if I add '-fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre' to '-fno-builtin-memset'
in the dg-options. The optimization is also defeated If I add a line such as

  x[1] = 1;

Although I doubt this behavior is a bug, I'll open a new PR for it tomorrow
unless there is some objection.