From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2640 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2013 22:00:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 2186 invoked by uid 48); 7 Feb 2013 21:59:42 -0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271 Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libitm X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00733.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #45 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-02-07 21:59:38 UTC --- > ... Bootstrap regression > tested for tm.exp and libitm subdirectory on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with Xcode > 4.2 and x86_64-apple-darwin12 with Xcode 4.6. Can someone test darwin9 and > x86_64-apple-darwin10 with Xcode 3.2.6 to make sure that the linker bug > mentioned in the previous patch > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00851.html) doesn't re-appear? With the new patch, the same tests (tm.exp and libitm) passed without regression on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with Xcode 3.2.6. If needed I can repeat it for ppc-d9, but don't expect any result before the end of the week-end.