From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-412087-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3419 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2013 17:46:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 2996 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2013 17:45:48 -0000
From: "tmsriram at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tmsriram at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-55742-4-jaucewF2RS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55742-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55742-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01206.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742

--- Comment #13 from Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram at google dot com> 2013-01-14 17:45:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Either use a different name of the attribute (replace target with mv_target or
> > whatever), or require a new attribute (mv?) to be present for multi-versioning
> > (mv attribute on any of the decls would enable it, if mv attribute isn't
> > present on either of the two decls being merged, then the target attribute is
> > merged as before 4.8).
> 
> 
> I like this proposal:

I too like just using a different attribute name. I will prepare a patch asap
for this.

Thanks
Sri.

> 
> >require a new attribute (mv?) to be present for multi-versioning
> > (mv attribute on any of the decls would enable it, if mv attribute isn't
> > present on either of the two decls being merged, then the target attribute is
> > merged as before 4.8)
> 
> 
> David