public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/55757] Suboptimal interrupt prologue/epilogue for ARMv7-M (Cortex-M3)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55757-4-EXHAJFk0mZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55757-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55757

Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P5
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-12-20
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-20 16:52:05 UTC ---
The code is there to re-align the stack to 64-bit alignment as required by the
ABI (early versions of the M3 did not have the ability to do this in HW).  The
reason two registers are pushed, rather than one is that this is also needed to
keep the stack aligned and pushing two registers uses less code than adjusting
the stack in a separate insn.

Of course, in this trivial case, the stack realignment isn't necessary as the
compiler should be able to tell that nothing requires re-alignment of the
stack.  But it's a corner case and it's much more common for this to be needed.

If you really know that you don't need stack-alignment on an M3, then just
remove the interrupt attribute.  It really doesn't serve any other purpose on
M-profile cores other than to cause the stack realignment.

Marking as an enhancement.  The code generated today is correct, but
sub-optimal.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-12-20 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-20 15:04 [Bug rtl-optimization/55757] New: " freddie_chopin at op dot pl
2012-12-20 15:24 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/55757] " freddie_chopin at op dot pl
2012-12-20 16:52 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-12-20 17:08 ` freddie_chopin at op dot pl
2012-12-21  3:23 ` joey.ye at arm dot com
2012-12-21  3:32 ` joey.ye at arm dot com
2012-12-21  7:09 ` freddie_chopin at op dot pl
2013-03-02 15:23 ` web at brolinembedded dot se
2023-11-28 23:10 ` yann at poupet dot eu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55757-4-EXHAJFk0mZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).