From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24979 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2012 07:09:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 24875 invoked by uid 48); 21 Dec 2012 07:09:00 -0000 From: "freddie_chopin at op dot pl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/55757] Suboptimal interrupt prologue/epilogue for ARMv7-M (Cortex-M3) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: freddie_chopin at op dot pl X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg02073.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55757 --- Comment #6 from Freddie Chopin 2012-12-21 07:08:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Former is better on code size, latter wins on performance. Hopefully this > explains everything. Indeed, it's clear now. Thank you for your time!