From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17128 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2013 13:49:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 17002 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jan 2013 13:49:17 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/55797] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge has no corresponding call_stmt Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg02163.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55797 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-23 13:49:17 UTC --- For 4.9, wouldn't it be better to get all functions through the very early passes (up to and including build_ssa (or one or three passes after it, but before pass_inline_parameters)), then in another loop run the rest of early passes (i.e. inline_parameters/einline, ..., eipa_sra, ..., pass_inline_parameters) and then the normal IPA queue? The amount of issues we have with functions not in SSA form yet, whether it is in early inliner, or eipa_sra, etc. is big.