From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9710 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2013 15:26:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 9396 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jan 2013 15:25:50 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/55882] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:26:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00659.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2013-01-08 15:25:46 UTC --- GCC clealy thinks that (insn 21 20 0 2 (set (mem/j:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 195) (const_int 10 [0xa])) [0+-2 S4 A32]) (reg:SI 201)) t.i:85 -1 is 4-byte aligned (but it _does_ have this strange MEM_OFFSET setting ... which should be useless without a MEM_EXPR). Does unsigned short testfunction(void) { mystruct dmfe[8]; unsigned i = 0; dmfe[0].use_alt_rd_dqs = 1; dmfe[i].use_alt_rd_dqs = 0; return dmfe[0].use_alt_rd_dqs; } extern void abort (void); int main () { if (testfunction() != 0) abort (); } abort for you?