From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29737 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2013 09:49:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 28984 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jan 2013 09:48:43 -0000 From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7/4.8 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00919.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-10 09:48:41 UTC --- I have bootstrapped and tested the patch from comment #11 on sparc64-linux (gcc63 on compile farm) and there were no issues (actually g++.old-deja/g++.law/operators23.C failed because ld returned 2 but that is almost certainly noise).