From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6325 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2013 17:32:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 6093 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2013 17:31:59 -0000 From: "abel at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: abel at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: abel at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg02003.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-01-21 17:31:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Indeed, with #c18 patch I can reproduce the ICE. Andrey, can you try that too? Sure, will do, I'll be out of office on Tuesday though. Thanks a lot for yours and David's help. The libbacktrace patch was just an attempt to get all the necessary information in the dump, only for this test. Sorry it didn't work out.