From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19568 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2013 13:43:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 17832 invoked by uid 48); 8 Jan 2013 13:42:34 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/55893] [4.7/4.8 Regression][C++11] runtime segfault with static const object with virtual destructor Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:43:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, | |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-08 13:42:30 UTC --- Caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/PR49673 I believe. Perhaps instead of testing whether TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING we need to check if the type has non-trivial destructor (is a user destructor on const qualified vars allowed to store into the var anywhere?) or just a special case virtual dtors that do change the vtable pointer?