From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3885 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2013 18:42:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 2438 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jan 2013 18:42:22 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/55898] Can't obtain stack trace Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55898 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |normal --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-07 18:42:21 UTC --- I bet this is because --enable-sjlj-exceptions turns off the output of the dwarf2 eh_frame which is used by the debugger to unwind the frames in most cases if the frame pointer is omitted. Why are you using SJLJ exceptions anyways? They are much slower when exceptions don't happen.