From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-411407-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8613 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2013 15:54:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 8573 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jan 2013 15:54:33 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/55900] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed Known to fail
Message-ID: <bug-55900-4-2CZ84V6vK9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-55900-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-55900-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00526.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55900

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-01-07
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|                            |4.7.2, 4.8.0

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-07 15:54:32 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:

template<typename _Tp> class complex;
template<>     
struct complex<double>
{
  typedef __complex__ double _ComplexT;
  constexpr complex(double __r = 0.0, double __i = 0.0)
      : _M_value{ __r, __i } { }
  _ComplexT _M_value;
};
template <typename Tp> 
struct B
{
  B() { complex<double>((true ? 1.0 : complex<double>())); } 
};

4.6 does not support the initializer list, so technically not a regression.