From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30728 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2013 09:47:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 30675 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jan 2013 09:47:30 -0000 From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++ Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:47:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01111.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 Eric Botcazou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #41 from Eric Botcazou 2013-01-13 09:47:29 UTC --- > I do apologise for consuming so much of everyone's time. My only defence being > it wasn't terribly obvious without the comparison of assembler in #24, and an > over reliance on the configure scripts filling in the blanks. No need for any apology here. And you did all the real work... > Not sure if that is a deficiency that can be tested for/warned against between > glibc/gcc Clearly something went wrong on the Fedora side, as I don't understand how they can ship a glibc without TLS support in 2012. That's worth reporting to them (if not already done). Maybe the TLS detection mechanism could be improved on the compiler side, but that's not easy when you're not compiling in native mode.