From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20895 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2013 18:40:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 19455 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jan 2013 18:39:47 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/55924] [C++11] Not all copy-assignment operator forms are correctly detected Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00861.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55924 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2013-01-09 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-09 18:39:46 UTC --- Clang thinks you need to add mine() = default; mine(const mine&) = default; for the code to be accepted and I agree, otherwise the operator=(mine) assignment operator calls the copy constructor which is deleted because of a user-declared move assignment operator.