* [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working
2013-01-10 5:04 [Bug c++/55931] New: Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working vince.rev at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-10 5:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-11 13:22 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-10 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-10 05:18:11 UTC ---
> std::integral_constant<int, x.get()> i; // This is not working
Most likely because Test<int> is not complete at the time of parsing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working
2013-01-10 5:04 [Bug c++/55931] New: Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working vince.rev at gmail dot com
2013-01-10 5:18 ` [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-11 13:22 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-01-11 13:27 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com @ 2013-01-11 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.kruegler at
| |googlemail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2013-01-11 13:22:13 UTC ---
When using gcc 4.8.0 20130106 (experimental)
with flags
-Wall -std=c++11 -pedantic
I get an internal compiler error for the line:
static constexpr Test<int> x(42);
"12|internal compiler error: tree check: expected target_expr, have cast_expr
in check_initializer, at cp/decl.c:5699"
Should this be reported separately?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working
2013-01-10 5:04 [Bug c++/55931] New: Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working vince.rev at gmail dot com
2013-01-10 5:18 ` [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-11 13:22 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
@ 2013-01-11 13:27 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-01-11 14:38 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com @ 2013-01-11 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2013-01-11 13:26:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Most likely because Test<int> is not complete at the time of parsing.
But this should be considered as a compiler defect, right?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working
2013-01-10 5:04 [Bug c++/55931] New: Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working vince.rev at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-11 13:27 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
@ 2013-01-11 14:38 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-11 18:32 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-11 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-01-11
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-11 14:37:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Should this be reported separately?
Yes please, but note this PR in the comments and vice versa, in case they turn
out to be fixed by the same change.
(In reply to comment #3)
> But this should be considered as a compiler defect, right?
Right.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working
2013-01-10 5:04 [Bug c++/55931] New: Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working vince.rev at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-11 14:38 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-11 18:32 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-02-15 19:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com @ 2013-01-11 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2013-01-11 18:32:13 UTC ---
The ICE bug of 4.8.0 has been submitted as bug 55944
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working
2013-01-10 5:04 [Bug c++/55931] New: Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working vince.rev at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-11 18:32 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
@ 2013-02-15 19:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-17 2:42 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-15 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-15 19:29:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 29473
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29473
55931.patch
Patch waiting for 4.8 to branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working
2013-01-10 5:04 [Bug c++/55931] New: Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working vince.rev at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-15 19:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-03-17 2:42 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-01 21:05 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-09 22:53 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-03-17 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-17 02:40:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Mar 17 02:39:51 2013
New Revision: 196746
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196746
Log:
PR c++/55931
* parser.c (cp_parser_template_argument): Don't
fold_non_dependent_expr.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-template4.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working
2013-01-10 5:04 [Bug c++/55931] New: Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working vince.rev at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-17 2:42 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-04-01 21:05 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-09 22:53 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-01 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-01 21:05:51 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.9.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/55931] [C++11] Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working
2013-01-10 5:04 [Bug c++/55931] New: Constexpr member function inside a static member is not working vince.rev at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-04-01 21:05 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-12-09 22:53 ` rmansfield at qnx dot com
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rmansfield at qnx dot com @ 2013-12-09 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield at qnx dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rmansfield at qnx dot com
--- Comment #9 from Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield at qnx dot com> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #6)
> Created attachment 29473 [details]
> 55931.patch
>
> Patch waiting for 4.8 to branch.
Jason, do you mind moving this over to the 4.8 branch? It seems you intended
to.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread