From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27980 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2013 15:16:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 27895 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2013 15:15:53 -0000 From: "ysrumyan at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/55970] [x86] Avoid reverse order of function argument gimplifying Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ysrumyan at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01181.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55970 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-01-14 15:15:52 UTC --- I pointed out that this code is not C standard compliant but it occurred in customer application that should be ported to x86 platform. This bug is not issued by gcc and very hard detected. Customer has more then 2000 such patterns in its application and he is not sure that all such patterns were found. So I still assume that we should fix it for x86 platform. Note also that icc does not have such issue.