public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:51:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-55975-4-O4BBPffDnY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-55975-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-16 11:50:47 UTC --- I think for 44->46 bits we can still make it constant. But generally, the constructors of libasan are usually run from the stack of the initial thread, so it should be enough to look at address of any local variable and check if it is around (1 << 44) - epsilon or (1 << 46) - epsilon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 11:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-01-14 19:15 [Bug sanitizer/55975] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test schwab@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-15 6:12 ` [Bug sanitizer/55975] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 20:00 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-16 10:01 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:14 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:47 ` [Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64 kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2013-01-16 11:54 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 19:12 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-17 8:30 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 23:24 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-17 23:52 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-18 8:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 8:26 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 11:41 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 12:30 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 13:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 13:21 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-18 13:26 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-18 13:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 15:34 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 15:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 15:46 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 9:11 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 12:22 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 12:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 12:52 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 13:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 13:19 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 13:32 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 13:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 13:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 13:50 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 16:26 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-24 7:19 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-24 13:31 ` wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-24 13:47 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-55975-4-O4BBPffDnY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).