From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22567 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2013 13:19:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 22508 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jan 2013 13:19:32 -0000 From: "kcc at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg02155.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #29 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-01-23 13:19:30 UTC --- >> Why doesn't it error for unlimited stack say on x86_64? Because on x86_64 the stack is still high enough (we are lucky). Note: I would not generally care about unlimited stack, but for some obscure reason GNU make spawns its sub-processes with unlimited stack.