public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jnapoli at alum dot mit.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/55993] tuple_cat not a constant expression for result size >= 3
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-55993-4-Nvdmjj9Z4c@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-55993-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993

--- Comment #3 from Joshua Napoli <jnapoli at alum dot mit.edu> 2013-01-15 18:44:10 UTC ---
The problem has to do with a completely empty struct being used twice
consecutively in the tuple type list. std::tuple<A,A> inherits from A (by
inheriting _Head_base<A> which inherits A). Maybe there is a problem with
confusing the inherited types when struct A is empty and the base A might not
have a separate address from the top-level tuple.



It compiles OK when I add a member variable:

struct A { constexpr A() : x(0) {} int x; };
constexpr std::tuple<A,A> t;
constexpr auto a = decltype(t)::_M_head(t);



But fails without it:

struct A { constexpr A() /*: x(0)*/ {} /*int x;*/ };
constexpr std::tuple<A,A> t;
constexpr auto a = decltype(t)::_M_head(t);



It compiles OK when I use two different classes

struct A { constexpr A() {} };
struct B { constexpr B() {} };
constexpr std::tuple<A,B> t;
constexpr auto a = decltype(t)::_M_head(t);



If fails to build with two As and a B:

struct A { constexpr A() {} };
struct B { constexpr B() {} };
constexpr std::tuple<A,A,B> t;
constexpr auto a = decltype(t)::_M_head(t);



(Note that std::get<0>( std::tuple<...> ) returns std::tuple<...>::_M_head(t).)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-15 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-15 16:53 [Bug libstdc++/55993] New: " jnapoli at alum dot mit.edu
2013-01-15 17:26 ` [Bug libstdc++/55993] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-15 17:29 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-15 18:44 ` jnapoli at alum dot mit.edu [this message]
2013-01-15 19:15 ` [Bug c++/55993] [C++11] derived-to-base conversion fails in constant expression redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-15 19:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-15 19:27 ` jnapoli at alum dot mit.edu
2013-01-15 19:34 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-15 19:39 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-13 17:57 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-15 19:28 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-26 15:49 ` splinterofchaos at gmail dot com
2015-02-26 17:12 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-55993-4-Nvdmjj9Z4c@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).