public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/56000] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test
@ 2013-01-16  2:15 danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-16  7:58 ` [Bug middle-end/56000] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-16  2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000

             Bug #: 56000
           Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0
                    -W -Wall output pattern test
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: danglin@gcc.gnu.org
              Host: hppa*-*-* (32-bit)
            Target: hppa*-*-* (32-bit)
             Build: hppa*-*-* (32-bit)


/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libffi/include
-I/test/gnu/gcc/gc
c/libffi/testsuite/../include 
-I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./
libffi/include/.. -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libffi/.libs 
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs  -lffi
-lm   -o ./cls_uchar_va.exe    (timeout = 300)spawn
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/gcc/
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall
-I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libffi/include
-I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libffi/testsuite/../include
-I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libffi/include/..
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libffi/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/
objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -lffi -lm -o
./cls_uchar_va.exePASS: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for
excess errors)Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
.:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/gcc:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libffi/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs:.:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/gcc:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hp
pa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libffi/.libs:/test/gnu/gcc/objdir32/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/
./libstdc++-v3/src/.libsspawn [open ...]67: 67 4res: 72PASS:
libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 67: 67 4
res: 72
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67

Introduced between r194655 and r194760.

Similar fails:

FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 67: 67 4
res: 41032
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67
FAIL: libffi.call/va_1.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 67: 67 4
res: 1124245576
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 67: 67 4
res: 4431944
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67
FAIL: libffi.call/va_1.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 67: 67 4
res: 1124245576
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 67: 67 4
res: 4431944
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67
FAIL: libffi.call/va_1.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 67: 67 4
res: 1124245576
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 67: 67 4
res: 4431944
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67
FAIL: libffi.call/va_1.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern test,
is 67: 67 4
res: 1124245576
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern test,
is 67: 67 4
res: 4431944
, should match 67: 67 4^M?
res: 67
FAIL: libffi.call/va_1.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test
  2013-01-16  2:15 [Bug middle-end/56000] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-16  7:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-16  8:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-16  7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-16 07:58:09 UTC ---
These are all new tests, so why do you consider that a regression?
E.g. the va_1.c test is xfailed even on x86_64-*-*, so I'd guess it isn't very
portable.  All these tests were added for aarch64, so I bet they haven't been
tested much on targets beyond that and a few most common ones.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test
  2013-01-16  2:15 [Bug middle-end/56000] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-16  7:58 ` [Bug middle-end/56000] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-16  8:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
  2013-01-16 10:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2013-01-16  8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2013-01-16 08:08:33 UTC ---
Does this help?
http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2012/msg00279.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test
  2013-01-16  2:15 [Bug middle-end/56000] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-16  7:58 ` [Bug middle-end/56000] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-16  8:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
@ 2013-01-16 10:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-16 16:25 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-16 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-01-16
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-16 10:05:03 UTC ---
Confirmed - I also see spurious libffi testing messages.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test
  2013-01-16  2:15 [Bug middle-end/56000] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-16 10:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-16 16:25 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
  2013-01-17 18:25 ` [Bug libffi/56000] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-17 18:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2013-01-16 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000

--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-16 16:24:47 UTC ---
On 1/16/2013 3:08 AM, schwab@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000
>
> --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2013-01-16 08:08:33 UTC ---
> Does this help?
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2012/msg00279.html
>
Yes, the two patches fix the libffi fails.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/56000] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test
  2013-01-16  2:15 [Bug middle-end/56000] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-16 16:25 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2013-01-17 18:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-17 18:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-17 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000

--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-17 18:24:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 17 18:24:08 2013
New Revision: 195277

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195277
Log:
2013-01-07  Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.org>

    PR middle-end/56000
    * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c,
    testsuite/libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c,
    testsuite/libffi.call/va_1.c: Testsuite fixes.

Modified:
    trunk/libffi/ChangeLog
    trunk/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c
    trunk/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_ushort_va.c
    trunk/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/va_1.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug libffi/56000] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test
  2013-01-16  2:15 [Bug middle-end/56000] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-17 18:25 ` [Bug libffi/56000] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-17 18:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-17 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-17 18:27:47 UTC ---
Should be fixed now.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-17 18:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-16  2:15 [Bug middle-end/56000] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-16  7:58 ` [Bug middle-end/56000] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-16  8:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2013-01-16 10:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-16 16:25 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2013-01-17 18:25 ` [Bug libffi/56000] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-17 18:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).