public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "npl at chello dot at" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/56002] New: [mutex] allow generic classes to be used without requiring plattform support for threads Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:21:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-56002-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56002 Bug #: 56002 Summary: [mutex] allow generic classes to be used without requiring plattform support for threads Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: npl@chello.at Created attachment 29179 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29179 patch for mutex. diffed against 4.7.2 I am using gcc & libstdc++ on a plattform that isnt natively supported and thus thread-functionality is not available from libstdc++. However I would like to be able to still use std::lock_guard, std::unique_lock, std::lock with my own mutex-classes. There ist no technical reason to prevent use of those generic classes and functions which are deliberately designed to work with custom implementations. ---mutex like it is now (all-or-nothing): #if HAS_GCC_THREADS <mutexes definiton> <generic stuff like defer_lock_t,lock_guard, unique_lock, lock> <once_flag> #endif ---------------------------------------- ---mutex like it should be: #if HAS_GCC_THREADS <mutexes definiton> #endif <generic stuff like defer_lock_t,lock_guard, unique_lock, lock> #if HAS_GCC_THREADS <once_flag> #endif ----------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 12:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-01-16 12:21 npl at chello dot at [this message] 2013-01-16 12:25 ` [Bug libstdc++/56002] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 15:07 ` [Bug libstdc++/56002] [C++11] allow generic locks " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2013-01-17 16:19 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17 20:44 ` npl at chello dot at 2013-03-16 19:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-16 19:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-16 20:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-24 17:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-56002-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).