public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/56011] New: [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload
@ 2013-01-16 20:47 daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
  2013-01-16 22:31 ` [Bug libstdc++/56011] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com @ 2013-01-16 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011

             Bug #: 56011
           Summary: [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss
                    volatile assignment operator overload
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com


Using gcc 4.8.0 trunk the following program - compiled with the flags

-pedantic-errors -std=c++11 -Wall

is rejected:

//----------------------------------
#include <atomic>

int main() {
  volatile std::atomic<bool> ab1;
  ab1 = true;
  volatile std::atomic_bool ab2;
  ab2 = true;
}
//----------------------------------

"main.cpp||In function 'int main()':|
main.cpp|5|error: ambiguous overload for 'operator=' (operand types are
'volatile std::atomic<bool>' and 'bool')|
main.cpp|5|note: candidates are:|
[..]gcc\include\c++\4.8.0\atomic|485|note: std::atomic<bool>&
std::atomic<bool>::operator=(const std::atomic<bool>&) volatile <deleted>|
[..]gcc\include\c++\4.8.0\atomic|64|note: std::atomic_bool&
std::atomic_bool::operator=(const std::atomic_bool&) volatile <deleted>|
main.cpp|7|error: use of deleted function 'std::atomic_bool&
std::atomic_bool::operator=(const std::atomic_bool&) volatile'|
[..]gcc\include\c++\4.8.0\atomic|64|error: declared here|
"

The problem is due to the missing overload (part of the specification):

bool operator=(bool __i) volatile noexcept;


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload
  2013-01-16 20:47 [Bug libstdc++/56011] New: [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
@ 2013-01-16 22:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-02-26 23:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-16 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-01-16
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload
  2013-01-16 20:47 [Bug libstdc++/56011] New: [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
  2013-01-16 22:31 ` [Bug libstdc++/56011] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-26 23:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-02-27  0:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-02-27  0:59 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-26 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-26 23:46:31 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Feb 26 23:46:21 2013
New Revision: 196296

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196296
Log:
    PR libstdc++/56012
    * include/bits/atomic_base.h (atomic_flag): Fix narrowing conversion.
    * testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/operators/56012.cc: New.

    PR libstdc++/56011
    * include/std/atomic (atomic<bool>::operator=(bool) volatile): Add
    missing overload.
    * testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/operators/56011.cc: New.

Added:
    trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/operators/56011.cc
    trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/cons/56012.cc
Modified:
    trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
    trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
    trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/std/atomic


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload
  2013-01-16 20:47 [Bug libstdc++/56011] New: [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
  2013-01-16 22:31 ` [Bug libstdc++/56011] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-02-26 23:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-27  0:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-02-27  0:59 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-27  0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-27 00:57:45 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Feb 27 00:57:36 2013
New Revision: 196301

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196301
Log:
    PR libstdc++/56012
    * include/bits/atomic_base.h (atomic_flag): Fix narrowing conversion.
    * testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/operators/56012.cc: New.

    PR libstdc++/56011
    * include/std/atomic (atomic<bool>::operator=(bool) volatile): Add
    missing overload.
    * testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/operators/56011.cc: New.

Added:
   
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/operators/56011.cc
   
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/cons/56012.cc
Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/libstdc++-v3/include/std/atomic


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/56011] [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload
  2013-01-16 20:47 [Bug libstdc++/56011] New: [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-02-27  0:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-27  0:59 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-27  0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56011

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.7.3

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-27 00:58:28 UTC ---
fixed


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-27  0:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-16 20:47 [Bug libstdc++/56011] New: [C++11] std::atomic<bool> and std::atomic_bool miss volatile assignment operator overload daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-01-16 22:31 ` [Bug libstdc++/56011] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-26 23:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-27  0:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-27  0:59 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).