From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27006 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2013 10:48:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 26936 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2013 10:48:41 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/56015] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] expand expands p[9] = COMPLEX_EXPR <-IMAGPART_EXPR , REALPART_EXPR >; incorrectly. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01608.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-01-17 10:48:40 UTC --- Hmm, I wonder if it isn't better to disable TER for these cases. We might run into similar issues with other loads (BIT_FIELD_REF and vectors for example).