[Bug target/56021] New: HAVE_STBLIB_H and HAVE_LIMITS_H not defined. Can't build gcc 3.2.1

[Bug target/56021] New: HAVE_STBLIB_H and HAVE_LIMITS_H not defined. Can't build gcc 3.2.1

[bryrober at cisco dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56021

             Bug #: 56021
           Summary: HAVE_STBLIB_H and HAVE_LIMITS_H not defined.  Can't
                    build gcc 3.2.1
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: blocker
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: bryrober@cisco.com


I am using CentOS 4.8 and gcc3.4.6 to build a gcc 3.2.1 cross compiler for
mipsisa32-elf (using binutils 2.13.1).  After configuring I get the following
error when issuing make -w all install 2>&1 | tee make.out on the command line.

gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -ffunction-sections -I.
-I/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/../include  -W -Wall -Wtraditional
-pedantic /home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:46: error: conflicting
types for 'malloc'
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:46: error: conflicting
types for 'malloc'
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c: In function
`code_for_qualifier':
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:623: warning: implicit
declaration of function `abort'
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c: In function
`ada_demangle':
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:1003: warning:
dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:1056: warning:
dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c: In function
`squangle_mop_up':
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:1149: warning: implicit
declaration of function `free'
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c: In function
`demangle_qualified':
/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:3282: warning: implicit
declaration of function `atoi'




If I fix this error I get a error in fib heap.c complaining about LONG_MIN
undeclared which is defined in limits.h.  Here is my configuration output

/home/bryrober/BRCM/gcc-3.2.1/configure --target=mipsisa32-elf
--prefix=/home/bryrober/BRCM/gnutools --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gnu-as
--with-gnu-ld --with-newlib
--with-gxx-include-dir=/home/bryrober/BRCM/gnutools/mipsisa32-elf/sys-include
--host=i686-unknown-linux-gnu --with-headers=/usr/include -v 2>&1 | tee
configure.out

[Bug target/56021] HAVE_STBLIB_H and HAVE_LIMITS_H not defined. Can't build gcc 3.2.1

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56021

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|blocker                     |normal

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-17 16:22:58 UTC ---
3.4.1 AND 3.4.6 are no longer supported.  
Since it is the host libiberty that is failing, you should look into config.log
from the libiberty directory to see why they are not being defined.  It might
be configure for that version is just broken with newer glibc/gcc's and there
is not much to be done here from our side except close this bug as won't fix.

[Bug target/56021] HAVE_STBLIB_H and HAVE_LIMITS_H not defined. Can't build gcc 3.2.1

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56021

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-17 16:24:08 UTC ---
Noone's going to change anything in the GCC 3.2.1 sources now, so I expect this
will be closed as WONTFIX.

And this can't be severity=blocker because it's obviously not going to block
the 3.2.2 release :)

[Bug target/56021] HAVE_STBLIB_H and HAVE_LIMITS_H not defined. Can't build gcc 3.2.1

[rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56021

rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As others have said, this is way too old, sorry.