public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "belagod at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/56025] ARM NEON polynomial types have broken overload resolution
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 17:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-56025-4-56VY0SvjOk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-56025-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56025

Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tejas Belagod from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tim Northover from comment #0)
> > While investigating bug #56024, we discovered this problem in the same area.
> > Essentially, GCC has semi-special builtin types to cover poly8_t and
> > poly16_t defined in arm_neon.h.
> > 
> > These types are used by G++ when calculating the overload resolution. The
> > following two functions can both be defined with no issues in the front-end:
> > 
> > #include <arm_neon.h>
> > void foo(short s) {}
> > void foo(__builtin_neon_poly16 s) {}
> > 
> > However, in the resulting assembly they are both mangled as _Z3foos, which
> > causes a conflict.
> > 
> > This mangling area is likely to be affected by any change fixing 56024, so a
> > sensible combined solution might be a good idea.
> 
> This should now be fixed. Now mangled as _Z3foos and _Z3foo10__Poly16_t
> respectively.
> 
> 	.cpu generic+fp+simd
> 	.file	"gpp.cpp"
> 	.text
> 	.align	2
> 	.p2align 3,,7
> 	.global	_Z3foos
> 	.type	_Z3foos, %function
> _Z3foos:
> .LFB3026:
> 	.cfi_startproc
> 	ret
> 	.cfi_endproc
> .LFE3026:
> 	.size	_Z3foos, .-_Z3foos
> 	.align	2
> 	.p2align 3,,7
> 	.global	_Z3foo10__Poly16_t
> 	.type	_Z3foo10__Poly16_t, %function
> _Z3foo10__Poly16_t:
> .LFB3027:
> 	.cfi_startproc
> 	ret
> 	.cfi_endproc
> .LFE3027:
> 	.size	_Z3foo10__Poly16_t, .-_Z3foo10__Poly16_t
> 	.ident	"GCC: (unknown) 5.0.0 20141229 (experimental)"

Sorry, wrong target. Still doesn't seem to be fixed for aarch32.
>From gcc-bugs-return-472325-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jan 06 17:36:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-472325-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9069 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2015 17:36:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8962 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jan 2015 17:36:05 -0000
From: "belagod at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/56025] ARM NEON polynomial types have broken overload resolution
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 17:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56025-4-q8BsQpHjRU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56025-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56025-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2
Content-length: 298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idV025

--- Comment #4 from Tejas Belagod <belagod at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The ABI does not define an internal type name for scalar poly types -
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0042e/IHI0042E_aapcs.pdf.
This will need an ABI update.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-06 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-18  9:39 [Bug c++/56025] New: " Tim.Northover at arm dot com
2013-01-18  9:52 ` [Bug c++/56025] " rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-06 17:14 ` [Bug target/56025] " belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-06 17:21 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-01-07 14:37 ` belagod at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-56025-4-56VY0SvjOk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).