public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8 Regression] Simplification to constants not done Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:30:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-56049-4-O4xcWUISGd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-56049-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2013-01-21 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 13:30:00 UTC --- Programs optimizing to a constant are artifical enough to mark this WONTFIX. The lowering was deliberate to not grow object size too much. Maybe Honza want's to investigate why heuristics do not detect the all-constant outcome.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-21 13:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-01-20 10:23 [Bug tree-optimization/56049] New: " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-20 10:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/56049] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-20 10:32 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-01-20 17:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 13:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2013-02-08 15:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11 22:02 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-11 22:56 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 11:07 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2013-02-12 14:22 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 14:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-22 14:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-31 10:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-16 9:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-05-22 9:01 ` [Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-12-19 13:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-23 8:14 ` [Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 19:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-56049-4-O4xcWUISGd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).