From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20226 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2013 13:30:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 19986 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jan 2013 13:30:00 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8 Regression] Simplification to constants not done Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01967.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2013-01-21 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-01-21 13:30:00 UTC --- Programs optimizing to a constant are artifical enough to mark this WONTFIX. The lowering was deliberate to not grow object size too much. Maybe Honza want's to investigate why heuristics do not detect the all-constant outcome.