[Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
@ 2013-01-21  6:30 d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 16:28 ` [Bug lto/56061] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (18 more replies)
  0 siblings, 19 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-21  6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

             Bug #: 56061
           Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at
                    ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: lto
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: d.g.gorbachev@gmail.com


Created attachment 29231
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29231
Testcase

GCC 4.8.0 20130120 (experimental).

lto1: internal compiler error: in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267
0x8367899 inline_call(cgraph_edge*, bool, vec<cgraph_edge*, va_heap, vl_ptr>*,
int*, bool)
    ../../gcc-4.8/gcc/ipa-inline-transform.c:263
0x8357d10 inline_small_functions
    ../../gcc-4.8/gcc/ipa-inline.c:1613
0x835817f ipa_inline
    ../../gcc-4.8/gcc/ipa-inline.c:1794
Please submit a full bug report,


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-23 16:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-28 14:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-23 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.8.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 16:28 ` [Bug lto/56061] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-28 14:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-30 10:54 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-28 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-01-28
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-28 14:35:29 UTC ---
Confirmed.  Compile-time -O1 vs. link/WPA-time -O0 (I don't think we
necessarily
want to support this fully... we do want to support compile-time -O0 vs.
link-time -O1)

Not sure why size estimates go wrong in this case though.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2013-01-23 16:28 ` [Bug lto/56061] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-28 14:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-30 10:54 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2013-01-30 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-30 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2013-01-30 10:54:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)

> I don't think we necessarily want to support this fully...

Are such bug reports useful, or it's just a nuisance to you, gcc devs? :)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-30 10:54 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-30 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-30 11:21 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-30 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-30 11:21:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> 
> > I don't think we necessarily want to support this fully...
> 
> Are such bug reports useful, or it's just a nuisance to you, gcc devs? :)

They are useful.  It should be technically possible to support -O1 vs. -O0,
and if not, we have means to forcefully enable -O1 at link-time (which we
should do then).


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-30 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-30 11:21 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-30 11:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-30 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-30 11:20:39 UTC ---
Does it make sense to allow "-O0 -flto" at all?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-30 11:21 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-30 11:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-30 11:29 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-30 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-30 11:25:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does it make sense to allow "-O0 -flto" at all?

The classical example why we want to support this is a static library
which you'd compile and install with -O0 -g -fno-fat-lto-objects.

At link time you can then either get a fully optimized program
(use -On) or a fully debug enabled program (use -O0 -g).

The other way around, compiling and installing with -O2 but then
at link time use -O0 -g to get a debug build is more questionable
(and most of the time a user error, unless -O0 was explicit at the
link command line).

Thus, eventually we'd want to provide an optimization level for link-time
if there was none specified by doing some magic in combining the optimization
levels used at compile-time.  Possible combinations are endless, thus
nobody has yet come up with a formal description of what would happen at
link-time.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-30 11:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-30 11:29 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-01-30 13:40 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-30 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-30 11:29:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does it make sense to allow "-O0 -flto" at all?

Answering myself, the docs have this example:

Additionally, the optimization flags used to compile individual files are not
necessarily related to those used at link time. For instance,

          gcc -c -O0 -flto foo.c
          gcc -c -O0 -flto bar.c
          gcc -o myprog -flto -O3 foo.o bar.o

This produces individual object files with unoptimized assembler code, but the
resulting binary myprog is optimized at -O3. If, instead, the final binary is
generated without -flto, then myprog is not optimized.

However, I still don't see the point of "-O0 -flto" at link-time. We should
either force it to be at least -O1 or (in my opinion better) give an error.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-30 11:29 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-30 13:40 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
  2013-01-30 17:17 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com @ 2013-01-30 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2013-01-30 13:39:37 UTC ---
> The other way around, compiling and installing with
> -O2 but then at link time use -O0 -g to get a debug
> build is more questionable

> However, I still don't see the point of "-O0 -flto"
> at link-time. We should either force it to be at
> least -O1 or (in my opinion better) give an error.

I think it could make sense. For example, I compile a certain static library
with `-O3 -flto', without `-g' (it's considered already debugged) and without
`-fno-fat-lto-objects' (so it can be used either with or without LTO); it is
shared between several programs. The programs have their own static libs, which
are compiled with `-g -O1 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects' (could be `-O0', but
doesn't work, PR55102). Then, they are linked using `-g -O0 -flto' to get a
(partially) debug enabled program, or with `-O3 -flto' for a fully optimized
program.

> the docs have this example

Yes, but there is an aforementioned bug 55102.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-30 13:40 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-30 17:17 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
  2013-02-26 15:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at ucw dot cz @ 2013-01-30 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2013-01-30 17:16:25 UTC ---
> They are useful.  It should be technically possible to support -O1 vs. -O0,
> and if not, we have means to forcefully enable -O1 at link-time (which we
> should do then).
I personally lean towards making all early passes -O level agnostic and
prohibit
mixing of LTO -O0 and optimized objects..
I do not see much of other options for making LTO .o files ready for
distribution
in libraries in longer run.

Honza


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-01-30 17:17 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
@ 2013-02-26 15:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-03-22 14:43 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-26 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-02-26 15:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-03-22 14:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-05-31 10:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-03-22 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.8.0                       |4.8.1

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-22 14:42:45 UTC ---
GCC 4.8.0 is being released, adjusting target milestone.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-03-22 14:43 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-05-31 10:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-10-16  9:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-05-31 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.8.1                       |4.8.2

--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.1 has been released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-05-31 10:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-10-16  9:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-05-22  9:02 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-10-16  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.8.2                       |4.8.3

--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.2 has been released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-10-16  9:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-22  9:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2014-12-19 13:34 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-22  9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.8.3                       |4.8.4

--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-05-22  9:02 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-19 13:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-01-29  7:20 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-19 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.8.4                       |4.8.5

--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.4 has been released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-12-19 13:34 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-01-29  7:20 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-23  8:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-01-29  7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE  |[4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in
                   |in lto1 (in inline_call, at |lto1 (in inline_call, at
                   |ipa-inline-transform.c:267) |ipa-inline-transform.c:267)

--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is fixed on mainline by streaming optimization nodes.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-01-29  7:20 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-23  8:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-26 20:04 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-26 20:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-23  8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.8.5                       |4.9.3

--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gcc-4_8-branch is being closed, re-targeting regressions to 4.9.3.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-23  8:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-06-26 20:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug lto/56061] [4.9 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267)
  2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-06-26 20:04 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  18 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56061

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.9.3                       |4.9.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-26 20:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-21  6:30 [Bug lto/56061] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in lto1 (in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:267) d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-01-23 16:28 ` [Bug lto/56061] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-28 14:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-30 10:54 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-01-30 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-30 11:21 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-30 11:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-30 11:29 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-30 13:40 ` d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2013-01-30 17:17 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2013-02-26 15:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-22 14:43 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-05-31 10:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-16  9:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-22  9:02 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:34 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-29  7:20 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.8/4.9 " hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23  8:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:04 ` [Bug lto/56061] [4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).