public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now
@ 2013-01-21 8:11 Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-01-21 9:49 ` [Bug web/56063] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 more replies)
0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch @ 2013-01-21 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
Bug #: 56063
Summary: last reconfirmed : now
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: Joost.VandeVondele@mat.ethz.ch
bugzilla has a calender to set the last reconfirmed date, which is moderately
useful (reconfirming a bug last confirmed in 2008 needs scrolling a year or
five in steps of a month). A 'now' button would be great (obviously insert the
current date and time).Alternatively, the calender could default to 'now'
instead of to the original date.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
@ 2013-01-21 9:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 11:28 ` [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-21 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-01-21
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 09:49:05 UTC ---
yes the calendar widget is useless currently
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-01-21 9:49 ` [Bug web/56063] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-21 11:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 12:20 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-21 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |LpSolit at netscape dot
| |net, manu at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
Summary|last reconfirmed : now |[bugzilla] last reconfirmed
| |: now
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 11:27:59 UTC ---
Adding Frédéric Buclin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-01-21 9:49 ` [Bug web/56063] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 11:28 ` [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-21 12:20 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2013-01-21 12:23 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2013-01-21 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #3 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> 2013-01-21 12:20:04 UTC ---
You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you
already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people who
remember dates such as "that was Tuesday last week", or "the first Friday of
last month, during our triage meeting", etc...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-21 12:20 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2013-01-21 12:23 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-01-21 12:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch @ 2013-01-21 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Joost.VandeVondele at mat
| |dot ethz.ch
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> 2013-01-21 12:22:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar
usually I need a calender to find the date of today ... ;-)
That's why I was suggesting to either have the calendar open by default on
'today' (which is usually quite close to what one can remember) or, have
literally a second button next to it, to insert 'now'.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-21 12:23 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
@ 2013-01-21 12:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-21 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 12:31:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you
> already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people who
> remember dates such as "that was Tuesday last week", or "the first Friday of
> last month, during our triage meeting", etc...
If the last reconfirmed date was three years ago, it's still annoying to slowly
scroll through every month from three years ago to "that Tuesday last week"
Does anyone reconfirm GCC bugs like that anyway?
I try the testcase and either want to confirm it "now" or not change it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-21 12:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-21 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 22:20 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-21 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 17:07:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you
> > already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people who
> > remember dates such as "that was Tuesday last week", or "the first Friday of
> > last month, during our triage meeting", etc...
>
> If the last reconfirmed date was three years ago, it's still annoying to slowly
> scroll through every month from three years ago to "that Tuesday last week"
>
> Does anyone reconfirm GCC bugs like that anyway?
> I try the testcase and either want to confirm it "now" or not change it.
Right I want to confirm it to today (now) too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-21 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-21 22:20 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2013-01-23 16:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2013-01-21 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> 2013-01-21 22:20:33 UTC ---
What I could do is to hide the calendar button and add a "Now" link instead.
I'm not sure that having both the calendar button and a "Now" link would be
nice from a UX point of view. And if almost nobody needs to go several days or
months in the past, the calendar button is pretty useless anyway.
The calendar always selects the currently set date because that's how it works
(its code is external to Bugzilla; it comes directly from Yahoo! YUI code).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-21 22:20 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2013-01-23 16:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-29 8:12 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-23 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-23 16:52:13 UTC ---
ISTR old bugzilla had a reconfirm-now-like style. As long as one would be
able to eventually re-set the reconfirmed date back if it was changed in
error the default should be to reconfirm "now".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-23 16:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-03-29 8:12 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-11-22 10:51 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-11-22 17:45 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch @ 2013-03-29 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> 2013-03-29 08:12:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> What I could do is to hide the calendar button and add a "Now" link instead.
I think this would be really appreciated.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-29 8:12 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
@ 2013-11-22 10:51 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-11-22 17:45 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch @ 2013-11-22 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
Frederic, are you still looking into this one ? I still believe this would be
progress.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-11-22 10:51 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
@ 2013-11-22 17:45 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2013-11-22 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2013-01-21 00:00:00 |2013-11-22
--- Comment #11 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
I added a "Now" link.
>From gcc-bugs-return-435561-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 22 17:46:04 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-435561-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26178 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2013 17:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26020 invoked by uid 48); 22 Nov 2013 17:46:00 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-56063-4-B6v39UPlLZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56063-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56063-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02338.txt.bz2
Content-length: 467
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Works fine. Fixed!
>From gcc-bugs-return-435562-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 22 17:50:58 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-435562-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30470 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2013 17:50:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30424 invoked by uid 48); 22 Nov 2013 17:50:55 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/45911] bugzilla: Changing status to assigned no longer auto-adjusts the assign-to field
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-45911-4-RUazD322Fg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-45911-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45911-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02339.txt.bz2
Content-length: 503
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #9 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
The "take" link exists besides the Assignee field.
>From gcc-bugs-return-435563-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 22 17:57:39 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-435563-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6216 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2013 17:57:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6157 invoked by uid 48); 22 Nov 2013 17:57:36 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/59256] qualified name in friend function declaration doesn't match previous declaration in inline namespace
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59256-4-Mw55vqtnq0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59256-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59256-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02340.txt.bz2
Content-length: 321
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idY256
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It only affects --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace not the default
config, but it makes <regex> unusable. We can work around it if needed by
moving __regex_algo_impl out of the __detail namespace.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-22 17:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-21 8:11 [Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-01-21 9:49 ` [Bug web/56063] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 11:28 ` [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 12:20 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2013-01-21 12:23 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-01-21 12:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-21 22:20 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2013-01-23 16:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-29 8:12 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-11-22 10:51 ` Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-11-22 17:45 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).