[Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now

[Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

             Bug #: 56063
           Summary: last reconfirmed : now
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: web
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: Joost.VandeVondele@mat.ethz.ch


bugzilla has a calender to set the last reconfirmed date, which is moderately
useful (reconfirming a bug last confirmed in 2008 needs scrolling a year or
five in steps of a month). A 'now' button would be great (obviously insert the
current date and time).Alternatively, the calender could default to 'now'
instead of to the original date.

[Bug web/56063] last reconfirmed : now

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-01-21
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 09:49:05 UTC ---
yes the calendar widget is useless currently

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |LpSolit at netscape dot
                   |                            |net, manu at gcc dot
                   |                            |gnu.org
            Summary|last reconfirmed : now      |[bugzilla] last reconfirmed
                   |                            |: now

--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 11:27:59 UTC ---
Adding Frédéric Buclin

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[LpSolit at netscape dot net]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

--- Comment #3 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> 2013-01-21 12:20:04 UTC ---
You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you
already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people who
remember dates such as "that was Tuesday last week", or "the first Friday of
last month, during our triage meeting", etc...

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Joost.VandeVondele at mat
                   |                            |dot ethz.ch

--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> 2013-01-21 12:22:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar

usually I need a calender to find the date of today ... ;-)

That's why I was suggesting to either have the calendar open by default on
'today' (which is usually quite close to what one can remember) or, have
literally a second button next to it, to insert 'now'.

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 12:31:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you
> already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people who
> remember dates such as "that was Tuesday last week", or "the first Friday of
> last month, during our triage meeting", etc...

If the last reconfirmed date was three years ago, it's still annoying to slowly
scroll through every month from three years ago to "that Tuesday last week"

Does anyone reconfirm GCC bugs like that anyway?
I try the testcase and either want to confirm it "now" or not change it.

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-21 17:07:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you
> > already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people who
> > remember dates such as "that was Tuesday last week", or "the first Friday of
> > last month, during our triage meeting", etc...
> 
> If the last reconfirmed date was three years ago, it's still annoying to slowly
> scroll through every month from three years ago to "that Tuesday last week"
> 
> Does anyone reconfirm GCC bugs like that anyway?
> I try the testcase and either want to confirm it "now" or not change it.

Right I want to confirm it to today (now) too.

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[LpSolit at netscape dot net]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

--- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> 2013-01-21 22:20:33 UTC ---
What I could do is to hide the calendar button and add a "Now" link instead.
I'm not sure that having both the calendar button and a "Now" link would be
nice from a UX point of view. And if almost nobody needs to go several days or
months in the past, the calendar button is pretty useless anyway.

The calendar always selects the currently set date because that's how it works
(its code is external to Bugzilla; it comes directly from Yahoo! YUI code).

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-23 16:52:13 UTC ---
ISTR old bugzilla had a reconfirm-now-like style.  As long as one would be
able to eventually re-set the reconfirmed date back if it was changed in
error the default should be to reconfirm "now".

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

--- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> 2013-03-29 08:12:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> What I could do is to hide the calendar button and add a "Now" link instead.

I think this would be really appreciated.

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch> ---
Frederic, are you still looking into this one ? I still believe this would be
progress.

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

[LpSolit at netscape dot net]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2013-01-21 00:00:00         |2013-11-22

--- Comment #11 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
I added a "Now" link.
>From gcc-bugs-return-435561-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 22 17:46:04 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-435561-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26178 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2013 17:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26020 invoked by uid 48); 22 Nov 2013 17:46:00 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-56063-4-B6v39UPlLZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56063-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56063-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02338.txt.bz2
Content-length: 467

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063

Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #12 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
Works fine. Fixed!
>From gcc-bugs-return-435562-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 22 17:50:58 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-435562-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30470 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2013 17:50:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30424 invoked by uid 48); 22 Nov 2013 17:50:55 -0000
From: "LpSolit at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/45911] bugzilla: Changing status to assigned no longer auto-adjusts the assign-to field
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: LpSolit at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-45911-4-RUazD322Fg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-45911-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45911-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02339.txt.bz2
Content-length: 503

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911

Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #9 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> ---
The "take" link exists besides the Assignee field.
>From gcc-bugs-return-435563-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 22 17:57:39 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-435563-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6216 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2013 17:57:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6157 invoked by uid 48); 22 Nov 2013 17:57:36 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/59256] qualified name in friend function declaration doesn't match previous declaration in inline namespace
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59256-4-Mw55vqtnq0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59256-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59256-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02340.txt.bz2
Content-length: 321

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idY256

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It only affects --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace not the default
config, but it makes <regex> unusable. We can work around it if needed by
moving __regex_algo_impl out of the __detail namespace.