public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/56109] Add light-weight ABI-compatible debug checks to standard containers
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:08:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-56109-4-gMB3pdCf3C@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-56109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56109

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=86843,
                   |                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=56103

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> The __google_stl_* checks were added by these commits ...
> 
> Strict weak ordering checks in algos and RB trees:
> 8cc511b5e5c0814584644c90cb0d65d27182eddd
> 
> Invariant checks and range checks in vector<bool>:
> ceeb7c3b17883b21f523ab0bef937f654b12eceb
> 
> Range checks in deque: 0681de38f1f402ad5f1fd9cf9959f304c36f7c10
> 
> Non-empty checks in vector: 2b4e2a67ff643ebdc4dababd95010699918ad9e0
> Dead stores in vector dtor: e1a3b2e088d16544b6b64e483e12ae77a813a274
> Invariant checks in vector: 7a058129926f4838bc1344f3674c1a35052a03e4
> Range checks in vector and vstring, scribbling in cleared vstring:
> 13480920300b3cf5f09d408fe249c873fbef1ee0
> 
> All the range checks and non-empty checks should be already enabled by
> _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS.
> 
> The invariant checking and strict weak order checks may be too expensive to
> add to _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS.

But see PR 86843.

> We could consider adding the dead stores in the destructors to wipe out the
> memory, so that subsequent accesses fail fast. Those stores should be
> optimised away so will have no cost in optimised builds, but might help in
> -O0 builds when debugging.

That's PR 56103.

So is there any reason to keep this PR open? Are there still checks we should
copy from the google branch?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-17 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-25 14:48 [Bug libstdc++/56109] New: " ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2014-10-13 14:22 ` [Bug libstdc++/56109] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-07 14:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-09 17:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-02 16:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-17 12:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-01-17 16:06 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com
2024-01-17 16:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-56109-4-gMB3pdCf3C@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).