* [Bug c++/56111] {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
@ 2013-01-25 19:14 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-26 10:36 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-25 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-25 19:14:03 UTC ---
You need to write _Complex or __complex__. complex is a macro that breaks code
from the standard library (think std::complex<double>) so we are forced to
undefine it. See PR54112 for details of the change.
If we really wanted to, I guess we could #undef complex at the beginning of
<complex> and condition the #undef in <complex.h> to the fact that <complex>
has been included before...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/56111] {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
2013-01-25 19:14 ` [Bug c++/56111] " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-26 10:36 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-01-26 10:39 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-01-26 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-01-26 10:36:19 UTC ---
What happens if we simply #undef at the beginning of <complex> and nothing
else? It seems to me that <complex> is the *real* place where such a macro
doesn't make sense and the primary change should go there (in case with further
adjustments).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/56111] {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
2013-01-25 19:14 ` [Bug c++/56111] " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-26 10:36 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-01-26 10:39 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-01-26 10:58 ` [Bug libstdc++/56111] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-01-26 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-01-26 10:38:55 UTC ---
Let's add Jakub in CC.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-26 10:39 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-01-26 10:58 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-26 11:11 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-26 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-26 10:58:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> What happens if we simply #undef at the beginning of <complex> and nothing
> else?
My idea in comment #1 was that if people include <complex> and then <complex.h>
(the order is important), with your suggestion, they won't be able to use
std::complex, so there is little point including <complex>.
Now in C++11, complex.h actually first includes ccomplex, which seems to be an
alias for complex... so there is no way to include complex.h and not complex.
Which seems to imply that at least in C++11, we should just always undef
complex.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-26 10:58 ` [Bug libstdc++/56111] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-26 11:11 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-01-26 11:36 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-01-26 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-01-26 11:11:24 UTC ---
Ok, I understand. Looks like, however, we are back to my original observation
in PR54112 that in C++03 mode we have less constraints and with more leeway we
could manage to keep on supporting this? I think submitter has a point that
it's weird that we don't support anymore in C++03 mode the very simple and old
kind of code attached here. I have no idea how complex it would be and whether
it's worth it, I would like to ear from the Release managers too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-26 11:11 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-01-26 11:36 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-31 12:31 ` [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-26 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-26 11:35:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ok, I understand. Looks like, however, we are back to my original observation
> in PR54112 that in C++03 mode we have less constraints and with more leeway we
> could manage to keep on supporting this? I think submitter has a point that
> it's weird that we don't support anymore in C++03 mode the very simple and old
> kind of code attached here. I have no idea how complex it would be and whether
> it's worth it, I would like to ear from the Release managers too.
What I said in comment #1 should take about 3-5 lines of macros and support
this in C++03 mode, I hope. Or we could partially revert my change and only
undef complex in C++11, leaving complex.h and complex as incompatible in C++03.
Or even never undef complex, though it doesn't seem very conforming.
Note while we are talking about this that I think it was a very bad decision
from the committee to make <complex.h> an alias for <complex>. A few minor
changes like in string.h are acceptable (they already cause trouble), but
complex.h is a C header, and C++ has no business replacing it with something
that doesn't define the same interface at all. It would have been better to not
mention complex.h at all, or only as not supported, leaving it up to
implementors to decide how to handle it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-26 11:36 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-31 12:31 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-31 12:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-31 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-01-31
Summary|{float,double,long double} |[4.8 Regression]
|complex not accepted |{float,double,long double}
|anymore |complex not accepted
| |anymore
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-31 12:31:18 UTC ---
Confirming as regression (doesn't mean it can't be marked wontfix later).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 12:31 ` [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-31 12:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-31 12:54 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-31 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-31 12:37:11 UTC ---
Yeah, I think my preference would be to #undef complex at the beginning of
<complex>, or ignore PR54112 altogether.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 12:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-31 12:54 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-31 12:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-31 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-31 12:53:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 29315
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29315
#undef complex only if <complex> is included
Completely untested patch just to make comment #1 more clear.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 12:54 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-31 12:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-01-31 13:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-01-31 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-01-31 12:57:46 UTC ---
Just to confirm that I like this sort of change. Thanks Marc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 12:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-01-31 13:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-31 16:54 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-31 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-31 13:05:52 UTC ---
Yeah, looks nice.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 13:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-31 16:54 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-01-31 17:00 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-01-31 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-31 16:53:42 UTC ---
Ok, I'll add a testcase and test the patch in a couple weeks if nobody beats me
to it (I am leaving tonight).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 16:54 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-01-31 17:00 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-02-08 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-01-31 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-01-31 16:59:52 UTC ---
Great, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 17:00 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-02-08 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-09 18:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-08 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-08 15:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-09 18:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-12 16:54 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-09 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-09 18:42:48 UTC ---
Given this is now P1, could the #c9 patch be committed soon, and perhaps just
defer a testcase for it when Marc returns?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-09 18:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-12 16:54 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-02-12 17:00 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-02-12 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
| |com
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-02-12 16:53:42 UTC ---
Marc, any news on this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-12 16:54 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-02-12 17:00 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-02-12 20:55 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-02-12 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-02-12 16:59:39 UTC ---
Jakub, if Marc remains unreachable I'll take care of carefully checking and
committing the patch in #c9 first thing tomorrow.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-12 17:00 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-02-12 20:55 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-13 21:59 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-13 22:03 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-12 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-12 20:55:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Marc, any news on this?
I landed less than 2 hours ago...
I'll see if I can handle it tomorrow.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-12 20:55 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-13 21:59 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-13 22:03 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-13 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #18 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-13 21:58:57 UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Wed Feb 13 21:58:53 2013
New Revision: 196034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196034
Log:
2013-02-13 Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
PR libstdc++/56111
* include/std/complex (complex): Undefine.
* include/c_compatibility/complex.h (complex): Only undefine if
<complex> has been included.
* testsuite/26_numerics/complex/56111.cc: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/56111.cc (with props)
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/c_compatibility/complex.h
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/std/complex
Propchange: trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/56111.cc
('svn:eol-style' added)
Propchange: trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/complex/56111.cc
('svn:keywords' added)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore
2013-01-25 17:51 [Bug c++/56111] New: {float,double} complex not accepted by g++-4.8 anymore jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2013-02-13 21:59 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-13 22:03 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-13 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #19 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-13 22:02:33 UTC ---
Done. Users should still convert their code to use _Complex instead if they
want it to work in C++11.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread