From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-416090-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29015 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2013 16:34:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 27403 invoked by uid 48); 22 Feb 2013 16:34:09 -0000
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/56131] [4.8 regression] gcc.dg/pr56035.c ICEs gcc on sparc-linux
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: steven at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56131-4-02bltH6Xxs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56131-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56131-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg02255.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131

--- Comment #16 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-22 16:33:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)

Yes, iff the CFG hasn't been freed, looking at BLOCK_FOR_INSN is of
course OK. I was referring to the situation after freeing the CFG.

Adding that comment to insn-notes.def seems like a good idea.

The patch looks reasonable. Does it fix bug 56242?