From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C80EA3858C27; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 09:55:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C80EA3858C27
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/56139] [9/10/11/12 Regression] unmodified static data could
 go in .rodata, not .data
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 09:55:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: deferred, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component target_milestone keywords
 cf_known_to_fail bug_severity cc short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-56139-4-wbhq1f9P3t@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56139-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56139-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 09:55:27 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D56139

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|tree-optimization           |ipa
   Target Milestone|---                         |13.0
           Keywords|                            |deferred
      Known to fail|                            |4.7.1
           Severity|enhancement                 |normal
                 CC|                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
            Summary|unmodified static data      |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
                   |could go in .rodata, not    |unmodified static data
                   |.data                       |could go in .rodata, not
                   |                            |.data

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We do handle:
static int x[] =3D {1, 2, 3, 4};

void bar (int x);

int func(int i)
{
    bar(x[i]);

    return 0;
}

Just fine. It is the IR of the other case where we mess up. And it looks li=
ke
it is a regression too. I suspect it is because we used to be able to create
back the ARARY_REF in GCC 4.6.x and that was removed in GCC 4.7 as it caused
other issues.=