From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5146 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2013 17:14:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 5037 invoked by uid 48); 4 Feb 2013 17:13:59 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/56151] [4.8 Regression] Performance degradation after r194054 on x86 Atom. Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56151 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-04 17:13:52 UTC --- Created attachment 29350 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29350 gcc48-pr56151.patch Untested patch for the peephole mentioned in previous comment.