public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/56193] ios_base should replace operator void* with explicit operator bool in C++11 onwards.
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-56193-4-XVEuiL6Bym@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-56193-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193

--- Comment #10 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
Yes, sure.
>From gcc-bugs-return-454994-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jun 26 09:18:36 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-454994-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14480 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2014 09:18:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14433 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jun 2014 09:18:25 -0000
From: "piotr5 at netscape dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/61617] New: add boost::coroutine
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: piotr5 at netscape dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-61617-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg02076.txt.bz2
Content-length: 954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?ida617

            Bug ID: 61617
           Summary: add boost::coroutine
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: piotr5 at netscape dot net

this has been suggested for addition in the next standard. it is an important
element of c++ because iterator-code can become quite incomprehensible
otherwise. but the main reason I'd like to see it as part of gcc is so that
programmers responsible for optimizations could start thinking up ways to
implement coroutines on the various platforms in creative ways. no need to wait
with optimization-ideas for the standard to include it, when it's already being
used in other programming languages. but if it isn't being used in c++ it
likely wont get much attention...


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-26  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-03 16:31 [Bug libstdc++/56193] New: " 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
2013-02-03 17:00 ` [Bug libstdc++/56193] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-03 17:40 ` 3dw4rd at verizon dot net
2013-02-07 15:14 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-02-11 10:31 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-11 10:32 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-02-11 11:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-11 11:49 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-08-08 13:13 ` david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
2014-06-26  5:57 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2014-06-26  9:04 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-26  9:05 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com [this message]
2014-09-12 19:01 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-24 22:14 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-09-24 23:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-56193-4-XVEuiL6Bym@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).