public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/56204] New: [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/quad_[23].f90 FAIL on Solaris 9/x86 Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:32:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-56204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56204 Bug #: 56204 Summary: [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/quad_[23].f90 FAIL on Solaris 9/x86 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org Host: i386-pc-solaris2.9 Target: i386-pc-solaris2.9 Build: i386-pc-solaris2.9 Since about 20121205, the quad_[23].f90 execution tests started to FAIL on Solaris 9/x86: FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -Os execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_3.f90 -Os execution test It aborts here: Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0xb5b23b96 in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) where #0 0xb5b23b96 in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #1 0xb5ad7dbe in raise () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #2 0xb5ac03fe in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #3 0xb5c54714 in _gfortrani_sys_abort () at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgfortran/runtime/error.c:173 #4 0xb5d0f3b8 in _gfortran_abort () at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgfortran/intrinsics/abort.c:33 #5 0x080511b2 in test_qp () at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90:34 #6 0x08051662 in main (argc=1, argv=0x8047a28) at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90:78 #7 0x08050a1d in _start () The test is l.34: 34 if (fp2 /= fp4) call abort() but unfortunately gdb 7.5 can read neither variable. (gdb) p fp2 $1 = <error reading variable> (gdb) p fp4 $2 = <error reading variable> The quad_2.f90 is a regression from 4.7, the quad_3.f90 test wasn't present there. Rainer
next reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 13:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-02-04 13:32 ro at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2013-02-08 15:47 ` [Bug fortran/56204] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 19:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 11:20 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-13 12:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 12:06 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-14 10:13 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-56204-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).