From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28896 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2013 10:43:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 28811 invoked by uid 48); 23 Feb 2013 10:42:56 -0000 From: "fabien at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/56243] [4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6645 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:43:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fabien at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fabien at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg02301.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-23 10:42:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Any news on this bug? It's one of only a few P1 regressions left. This bug triggers with --enable-checking on the constexpr stuff. I was looking at it yesterday, and tried to fix it in the same way than you fixed PR53816. It did work, but it caused a regression on constexpr-static10.C which I didn't manage to resolve yet. If I fail to find out what goes wrong this week-end, I will probably have to defer to someone more involved than me on the constexpr stuff. I didn't check if it was a regression wrt 4.7 with --enable-checking