From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-414706-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23004 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2013 22:10:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 22687 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2013 22:10:00 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/56251] no DW_AT_const_value  for static const member of a template class
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56251-4-huBIHvHma4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56251-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56251-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00871.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56251

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-08 22:09:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Note, this is a const static member, the initialization is the definition,
> if I don't initialize it, I would get an "Undefined symbol" linking error.
> This code is valid.

No, the code is invalid but a diagnostic is not required by the standard which
is why it is accepted.