public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "novulae at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/56259] GCC's configure script has a hard-coded setting of 'with_gmp' for FreeBSD
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-56259-4-9KYdhbmlGo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-56259-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56259

--- Comment #3 from Caleb Sunstrum <novulae at hotmail dot com> 2013-02-20 01:47:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This block of code was added to handle a special case seen on FreeBSD:
> (a) on some versions of FreeBSD circa 2004, the system installed copy of gmp.h
> was too old to support gcc
> (b) by default, FreeBSD ports system installs into /usr/local

Is there a reason why /path/to/gcc-source/configure --with-gmp=/usr/local
doesn't work? I don't have access to these older FreeBSDs, so I can't comment.

> 
> I note that the claimed serious side effects only happen when one installed gmp
> from ports (or otherwise installed it into /usr/local) *and* one attempted to
> build a gcc with a copy of gmp co-located with gcc source.

At the very least, this hack should propagate the settings downstream to mpfr
and mpc. But since --with-gmp=/usr/local will (should) do the same thing, I
don't see why it's necessary.

> 
> We need to think about the default user (which will likely not unpack gmp, mpfr
> and mpc) into the gcc source tree.

While I agree the default use case is important, I think it's more important to
note that there is nothing to suggest that this hack in play, and diagnosing
the failures + the unexpected side effects is quite difficult to do. I only
noticed this when trying to figure out why MPFR and MPC were failing to build
with GMP and tracing through the configure script.

Conversely, if no --with-gmp is specified and the default GMP is too old, one
could add additional text to the warning when configure fails - stating that
the GMP found in the default location is too old, and they may wish to specify
--with-gmp=/usr/local (if GMP exists there), or to build GMP from source as
part of GCC.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-20  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-08 23:02 [Bug bootstrap/56259] New: " novulae at hotmail dot com
2013-02-10 12:25 ` [Bug bootstrap/56259] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-18 22:25 ` ljrittle at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-20  1:47 ` novulae at hotmail dot com [this message]
2021-08-16 23:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-56259-4-9KYdhbmlGo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).