From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-417346-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31024 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2013 15:32:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 30300 invoked by uid 48); 10 Mar 2013 15:32:15 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/56293] Segfault when trying to access pass-by-reference value of a not-word-aligned REAL(16) /  -fno-align-commons
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-56293-4-YpaEGhGyk3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56293-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56293-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00788.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D56293

Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-10 1=
5:32:14 UTC ---

> The question is also whether one can construct a fully standard-conform e=
xample
> which fails without -fno-align-commons =E2=80=93 and whether some real-wo=
rld code uses
> COMMON in a way that would fails with alignments/padding.

      program main
      real a,f1,f2,d
      common /foo/ a,f1,f2,d
      a =3D 1.0
      d =3D 1.0
      call s1
      end
      subroutine s1
      real a,b
      double precision d
      common /foo/ a,d,b
      print *,a
      print *,b
      end