From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-415383-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26956 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2013 09:24:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 26918 invoked by uid 48); 15 Feb 2013 09:24:18 -0000
From: "michael.schlottke at sloede dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/56328] Explicit instantiation of inline function template works for base template, fails for specialized template
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: michael.schlottke at sloede dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-56328-4-HZNdr9BN4O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56328-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg01548.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56328

Michael Schlottke <michael.schlottke at sloede dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #8 from Michael Schlottke <michael.schlottke at sloede dot com> 2013-02-15 09:24:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > 
> > I fully agree. But why is there a difference then between the base template and
> > the specialization? I am not arguing that the specialized template should work
> > when declared inline, I am questioning the fact that the behavior is different
> > for specialized and non-specialized templates, and I could not find an
> > explanation in the standard.
> 
> The program is ill-formed, no diagnostic required, the standard doesn't have to
> define how it's handled.

OK. That's what I was missing. Thank you.