From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10243 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2013 06:31:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 10099 invoked by uid 48); 15 Feb 2013 06:30:49 -0000 From: "brooks at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/56335] New: Optimization assumes __attribute__((aligned(N))) always works. Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 06:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: brooks at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg01516.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56335 Bug #: 56335 Summary: Optimization assumes __attribute__((aligned(N))) always works. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: brooks@gcc.gnu.org Created attachment 29460 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29460 (Generated assembly code) As recently discussed in bug 56334, the documentation for __attribute__((aligned(N))) notes that it does not necessarily produce the requested alignment for static variables: "On many systems, the linker is only able to arrange for variables to be aligned up to a certain maximum alignment. (For some linkers, the maximum supported alignment may be very very small.)" However, it appears that GCC itself has not read this documentation! Consider this trivial .c file: #define N (1<<27) static float __attribute__((aligned(N))) a[128]; void foo() { if ((unsigned long) a % N == 0) bar(a); else bar_unaligned(a); } We are not actually going to get this static array aligned to a 128-megabyte alignment (especially if this goes into a shared library), but GCC nonetheless eliminates the branch and possible call to bar_unaligned. See, for instance, the output of this command line (where align5.c is the above file): i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -S -fpic align5.c -o align5.s There is clearly no reference to bar_unaligned in the generated assembly, indicating that it has been optimized out.