From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3174 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2013 15:51:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3022 invoked by uid 48); 8 Mar 2013 15:51:16 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/56339] [4.8 Regression]: Suboptimal register allocation Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:51:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00685.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56339 Uros Bizjak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2013-03-08 15:51:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > So - what regressed this compared to 4.7? It wasn't regmove.c changes. As said in comment 0: gcc-4.7 generates: f: addsd %xmm2, %xmm0 ret gcc-4.8 generates: f: addsd %xmm0, %xmm2 movapd %xmm2, %xmm0 ret