From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26147 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2013 11:21:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 25820 invoked by uid 48); 18 Feb 2013 11:20:47 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:21:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg01767.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-02-18 11:20:43 UTC --- There is now better ways of implementing -fstrict-volatile-bitfields which I repeatedly told the arm people. Not for 4.6, but for 4.7 and trunk.