public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/56393] SIGSEGV when -fsanitize=address and dynamic lib with global objects Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:04:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-56393-4-oGVx8nKjAl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-56393-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393 --- Comment #30 from Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com> --- Yes, but that must run before library constructors => .preinit_array. I'm not sure we want to add code like this to .preinit_array of all binaries that are NOT linked with AddressSanitizer ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 14:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-02-19 13:02 [Bug sanitizer/56393] New: " t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm dot com 2013-02-19 13:50 ` [Bug sanitizer/56393] " kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-19 14:02 ` t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm dot com 2013-02-19 14:11 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-19 15:23 ` t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm dot com 2013-02-19 15:27 ` t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm dot com 2013-02-19 18:34 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-19 20:38 ` eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com 2013-02-20 14:30 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-20 14:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-20 14:50 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-20 14:57 ` eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com 2013-02-20 15:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-20 18:30 ` eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com 2013-02-21 10:54 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-21 11:36 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-21 11:52 ` eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com 2013-02-22 6:39 ` t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm dot com 2013-02-22 6:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-22 7:02 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-22 9:02 ` t-gcc-bugzilla at snowelm dot com 2013-02-22 16:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-07 8:44 ` david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com 2013-04-08 6:32 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-08 6:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-01 21:35 ` david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com 2013-06-03 7:56 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-15 13:39 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-15 13:54 ` eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com 2013-10-15 14:02 ` pluto at agmk dot net 2013-10-15 14:04 ` eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com [this message] 2013-10-15 17:43 ` tetra2005 at gmail dot com 2013-10-15 17:45 ` tetra2005 at gmail dot com 2013-10-15 17:52 ` eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com 2013-10-15 18:04 ` tetra2005 at gmail dot com 2013-10-16 12:05 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-16 13:29 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-16 13:44 ` eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com 2013-10-16 14:02 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-30 7:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-30 8:12 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-30 8:14 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-30 8:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-30 9:38 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2014-09-30 8:36 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-56393-4-oGVx8nKjAl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).