public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/56415] [4.8 Regression] Performance regression after fix for 56273
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-56415-4-26hLcxdLsY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-56415-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56415

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.8.0
            Summary|Performance regression      |[4.8 Regression]
                   |after fix for 56273         |Performance regression
                   |                            |after fix for 56273

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-21 10:44:38 UTC ---
Ok, the fact is that with changes like

@@ -917,7 +839,7 @@
   _201 = *_111[_200];
   t[6] = _201;
   _206 = _108;
-  if (_108 == 8)
+  if (_108 > 7)
     goto <bb 18>;

@@ -906,7 +828,7 @@
   _187 = *_111[_186];
   t[5] = _187;
   _192 = _108;
-  if (_108 != 6)
+  if (_108 > 6)
     goto <bb 17>;
   else
     goto <bb 7>;

we weaken range information on one code-path but improve it on another.
We should be still able to figure out the original ranges though, so
this change probably only papered over the other PR.

I'll revert that change.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-21 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-21  8:55 [Bug tree-optimization/56415] New: " ysrumyan at gmail dot com
2013-02-21  8:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/56415] " ysrumyan at gmail dot com
2013-02-21  9:11 ` ysrumyan at gmail dot com
2013-02-21  9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-21 10:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2013-02-21 10:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/56415] [4.8 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-21 10:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-56415-4-26hLcxdLsY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).