public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/56429] New: [C++11] Explicitly defaulted private constructor is not private
@ 2013-02-22 21:51 redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-02-23 22:30 ` [Bug c++/56429] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-22 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56429

             Bug #: 56429
           Summary: [C++11] Explicitly defaulted private constructor is
                    not private
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: accepts-invalid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: redi@gcc.gnu.org


class A
{
    A() = default;
};
struct B : A { };

B b;

This should be rejected, but 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8 accept it.

(4.4 also accepts it, while 4.5 rejects it for a different reason.)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/56429] [C++11] Explicitly defaulted private constructor is not private
  2013-02-22 21:51 [Bug c++/56429] New: [C++11] Explicitly defaulted private constructor is not private redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-23 22:30 ` daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
  2013-07-16 16:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-07-26 12:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com @ 2013-02-23 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56429

Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |daniel.kruegler at
                   |                            |googlemail dot com

--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2013-02-23 22:30:35 UTC ---
This issue may have similar reasons as bug 54812.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/56429] [C++11] Explicitly defaulted private constructor is not private
  2013-02-22 21:51 [Bug c++/56429] New: [C++11] Explicitly defaulted private constructor is not private redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-02-23 22:30 ` [Bug c++/56429] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
@ 2013-07-16 16:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-07-26 12:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-07-16 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56429

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |charlie at charliedyson dot net

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 57913 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/56429] [C++11] Explicitly defaulted private constructor is not private
  2013-02-22 21:51 [Bug c++/56429] New: [C++11] Explicitly defaulted private constructor is not private redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-02-23 22:30 ` [Bug c++/56429] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
  2013-07-16 16:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-07-26 12:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-07-26 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56429

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This has just hit me again and is quite annoying if you do this specifically to
prevent deletion via pointer-to-base:

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54812 ***


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-26 12:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-22 21:51 [Bug c++/56429] New: [C++11] Explicitly defaulted private constructor is not private redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-23 22:30 ` [Bug c++/56429] " daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-07-16 16:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-07-26 12:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).