public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug go/56431] New: -lpthread should be added to -lgo
@ 2013-02-22 23:45 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2013-02-27 14:54 ` [Bug go/56431] " ian at airs dot com
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2013-02-22 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431

             Bug #: 56431
           Summary: -lpthread should be added to -lgo
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: go
        AssignedTo: ian@airs.com
        ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
        Depends on: 56353


+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #56353 +++

libjava.jni/invocation/PR16923.c behaves differently, depending
on linking with gold or ld. _Jv_RegisterClasses is weak reference
and libgcj.so isn't on the linker command line. Since libgcj.so isn't
on the linker command line, gold resolves _Jv_RegisterClasses to 0 and
ld silently resolves it to _Jv_RegisterClasses in libgcj.so:

[hjl@gnu-13 testsuite]$ readelf -sWr /tmp/PR16923.gold | grep
_Jv_RegisterClasses 
     8: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND _Jv_RegisterClasses
    37: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND _Jv_RegisterClasses
[hjl@gnu-13 testsuite]$ readelf -sWr /tmp/PR16923.bfd | grep
_Jv_RegisterClasses 
0000000000600cd0  0000000900000007 R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT     00000000004005e0
_Jv_RegisterClasses + 0
     9: 00000000004005e0     0 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT  UND _Jv_RegisterClasses
    59: 00000000004005e0     0 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT  UND _Jv_RegisterClasses
[hjl@gnu-13 testsuite]$]

-lgo has the same issue.  With the bfd linker, I got

[hjl@gnu-mic-2 go]$ ld --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_i386 -dynamic-linker
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/../lib/crt1.o /lib/../lib/crti.o
/export/build/gnu/gcc-asan/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/testsuite/go/../../32/crtbegin.o
-L/export/build/gnu/gcc-asan/build-x86_64-linux/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libgo
-L/export/build/gnu/gcc-asan/build-x86_64-linux/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libgo/.libs
-L/export/build/gnu/gcc-asan/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/testsuite/go/../../32
-L/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/../lib
-L/export/build/gnu/gcc-asan/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/testsuite/go/../..
array-1.o -lgobegin -lgo -lm --wrap=pthread_create -lgcc_s -lgcc -lc -lgcc_s
-lgcc
/export/build/gnu/gcc-asan/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/testsuite/go/../../32/crtend.o
/lib/../lib/crtn.o
ld:
/export/build/gnu/gcc-asan/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/testsuite/go/../../32/libgcc.a(generic-morestack.o):
undefined reference to symbol 'pthread_sigmask@@GLIBC_2.0'
ld: note: 'pthread_sigmask@@GLIBC_2.0' is defined in DSO /lib/libpthread.so.0
so try adding it to the linker command line
/lib/libpthread.so.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
[hjl@gnu-mic-2 go]$ 

gold links, but it generates

    51: 00000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND pthread_sigmask

It means that go executables generated by bfd ld and gold may behave
differently.  Go driver should add -lpthread to -lgo if libgo.so is
linked against libpthread.so.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug go/56431] -lpthread should be added to -lgo
  2013-02-22 23:45 [Bug go/56431] New: -lpthread should be added to -lgo hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2013-02-27 14:54 ` ian at airs dot com
  2013-02-27 16:59 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2013-02-27 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431

--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2013-02-27 14:54:22 UTC ---
The reference to pthread_sigmask in generic-morestack.c is weak, and the code
handles the weak reference correctly.  It looks like gold is doing the right
thing by emitting a weak reference.

I don't understand why GNU ld is complaining about an undefined weak reference.
 As far as I can see, this is a GNU ld bug; it should be testing
h->ref_regular_nonweak in the code that issues this "is defined in DSO"
warning.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug go/56431] -lpthread should be added to -lgo
  2013-02-22 23:45 [Bug go/56431] New: -lpthread should be added to -lgo hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2013-02-27 14:54 ` [Bug go/56431] " ian at airs dot com
@ 2013-02-27 16:59 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2013-02-27 18:50 ` ian at airs dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2013-02-27 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431

--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2013-02-27 16:59:17 UTC ---
The new GNU ld is complaining about an undefined weak reference because
it sees libpthread.so from DT_NEEDED in libgo.so. The old GNU ld just
silently adds libpthread.so from DT_NEEDED in libgo.so.  When creating
executables, GNU ld checks DT_NEEDED in DSOes on command line.  Since
libpthread.so is included from libgo.so for creating executables, it expects
libpthread.so will be used and pthread_sigmask is defined at run-time


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug go/56431] -lpthread should be added to -lgo
  2013-02-22 23:45 [Bug go/56431] New: -lpthread should be added to -lgo hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2013-02-27 14:54 ` [Bug go/56431] " ian at airs dot com
  2013-02-27 16:59 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2013-02-27 18:50 ` ian at airs dot com
  2013-02-27 19:36 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2013-02-27 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431

--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2013-02-27 18:49:43 UTC ---
Object OBJ has a weak reference to SYM.

OBJ is linked against shared library S1.  S1 does not define SYM.

S1 happens to be linked against shared library S2.  S2 does define SYM.

That will work fine: at runtime OBJ will see that SYM is defined, because S1
brings in S2.

Suppose that, later on, S1 is not linked against S2.  That will also work fine:
at runtime OBJ will see that SYM is not defined.

Right now GNU ld is issuing a warning because it sees that the weak reference
from OBJ will be defined at runtime by S2, brought in at runtime because S1 is
linked against S2.  GNU ld is suggesting that OBJ should be linked against S2
directly.  But nothing will go wrong if S1 is changed such that it does not
link against S2.

Therefore, GNU ld's warning is inappropriate.  There is no reason to link OBJ
against S2 in this case.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug go/56431] -lpthread should be added to -lgo
  2013-02-22 23:45 [Bug go/56431] New: -lpthread should be added to -lgo hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-02-27 18:50 ` ian at airs dot com
@ 2013-02-27 19:36 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2013-02-27 21:08 ` ian at airs dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2013-02-27 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431

--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2013-02-27 19:36:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Object OBJ has a weak reference to SYM.
> 
> OBJ is linked against shared library S1.  S1 does not define SYM.
> 
> S1 happens to be linked against shared library S2.  S2 does define SYM.
> 
> That will work fine: at runtime OBJ will see that SYM is defined, because S1
> brings in S2.
> 

This isn't what happens.  Since gold doesn't check S2 at link-time, it
resolves SYM to 0:

[hjl@gnu-6 pr15149]$ cat foo.c 
#include <stdio.h>

extern int xxx () __attribute__((weak));

int
foo ()
{
  if (&xxx)
    return xxx ();
  return 1;
}

int
main ()
{
  printf ("xxx: %d\n", foo ());
  return 0;
}
[hjl@gnu-6 pr15149]$ cat xxx.c
int
xxx ()
{
  return 0;
}
[hjl@gnu-6 pr15149]$ cat yyy.c
/* Dummy */
[hjl@gnu-6 pr15149]$ make y
gcc -Wl,--no-copy-dt-needed-entries    -c -o foo.o foo.c
gcc -Wl,--no-copy-dt-needed-entries -shared -fPIC -o libxxx.so xxx.c
gcc -Wl,--no-copy-dt-needed-entries -shared -fPIC -o libyyy.so yyy.c libxxx.so
-Wl,-rpath,.
gcc -Wl,--no-copy-dt-needed-entries -fuse-ld=gold -B./ -Wl,--no-as-needed -o y
foo.o libyyy.so -Wl,-rpath,.
[hjl@gnu-6 pr15149]$ ./y
xxx: 1
[hjl@gnu-6 pr15149]$ 

38: 0000000000000000     0 NOTYPE  WEAK   DEFAULT  UND xxx

If gold sees SYM defined in S2, it will create a R_X86_64_JUMP_SLO relocation,
set xxx value to the PLT entry and resolve xxx to the PLT entry.

000000401ad0  000700000007 R_X86_64_JUMP_SLO 0000000000400570 xxx + 0

7: 0000000000400570     0 FUNC    WEAK   DEFAULT  UND xxx

That is the difference between seeing SYM in S2 or not.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug go/56431] -lpthread should be added to -lgo
  2013-02-22 23:45 [Bug go/56431] New: -lpthread should be added to -lgo hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-02-27 19:36 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2013-02-27 21:08 ` ian at airs dot com
  2013-02-27 21:21 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2019-01-16 22:32 ` ian at airs dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2013-02-27 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431

--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2013-02-27 21:07:59 UTC ---
I see.  Interesting.  I wonder if that is a bug in gold.  I wonder what other
ELF linkers do.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug go/56431] -lpthread should be added to -lgo
  2013-02-22 23:45 [Bug go/56431] New: -lpthread should be added to -lgo hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-02-27 21:08 ` ian at airs dot com
@ 2013-02-27 21:21 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2019-01-16 22:32 ` ian at airs dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2013-02-27 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431

--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2013-02-27 21:20:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I see.  Interesting.  I wonder if that is a bug in gold.  I wonder what other

I think this is related to the gold bug:

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15153

> ELF linkers do.

On Linux, ld and gold set the standard.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug go/56431] -lpthread should be added to -lgo
  2013-02-22 23:45 [Bug go/56431] New: -lpthread should be added to -lgo hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-02-27 21:21 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2019-01-16 22:32 ` ian at airs dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2019-01-16 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 52633 bytes --]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431

--- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> ---
The workaround for this is probably to change gcc/go/gospec.c to remove the
need_thread variable.  That would have the effect of changing the only use of
need_thread to only test library > 0, which would mean that gccgo would add
-lpthread every time it adds -lgo.  (I don't plan to try implementing and
testing this myself.)
>From gcc-bugs-return-629506-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 22:41:03 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629506-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5587 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2019 22:41:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5505 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2019 22:40:59 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/88881] std::filesystem::status gives bad results on mingw32
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-88881-4-XjSoA7Km8H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88881-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88881-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02315.txt.bz2
Content-length: 283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88881

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This bug is the cause of:

FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc execution test

The trailing slashes in the paths cause the _wstat calls to fail.
>From gcc-bugs-return-629507-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 22:43:43 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629507-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10626 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2019 22:43:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10498 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2019 22:43:38 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/88888] New: Cannot construct filesystem::path from variable length array
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-88888-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02316.txt.bz2
Content-length: 862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88888

            Bug ID: 88888
           Summary: Cannot construct filesystem::path from variable length
                    array
           Product: gcc
           Version: 9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: rejects-valid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

// { dg-options "-std=gnu++17" }
#include <filesystem>
int main()
{
  int i = 2;
  char vla[i] = {};
  std::filesystem::path p = vla;
}


p.cc: In function 'int main()':
p.cc:7:29: error: conversion from 'char [i]' to non-scalar type
'std::filesystem::__cxx11::path' requested
    7 |   std::filesystem::path p = vla;
      |                             ^~~
>From gcc-bugs-return-629508-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 22:56:57 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629508-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36976 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2019 22:56:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 36921 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2019 22:56:52 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libbacktrace/88244] [libbacktrace] Failure to open .gnu_debuglink is silent
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libbacktrace
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-88244-4-BAL3JwKa32@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02317.txt.bz2
Content-length: 195

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88244

--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Discussed here ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00932.html ).
>From gcc-bugs-return-629509-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 22:57:20 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629509-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37873 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2019 22:57:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 37795 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2019 22:57:15 -0000
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/88699] [9 Regression] tree check fail: expected function_decl, have using_decl in add_method, at cp/class.c:1137
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-88699-4-Ym3DsTi0UQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88699-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88699-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02318.txt.bz2
Content-length: 196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88699

--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00962.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-629511-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 23:16:18 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629511-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61465 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2019 23:16:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59757 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2019 23:15:27 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/88886] [9 Regression] ice in get_constant, at c-family/c-format.c:292
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status see_also assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-88886-4-7PahWkuot5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88886-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88886-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02320.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88886

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=86125
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The patch posted for bug 86125 fixes this ICE and results in the output below. 
Let me try to revive it.

$ /build/gcc-86125/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-86125/gcc -S pr88886.c
pr88886.c:1:5: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘sscanf’;
expected ‘int(const char *, const char *, ...)’
[-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
    1 | int sscanf(long, unsigned[], ...);
      |     ^~~~~~
pr88886.c:1:1: note: ‘sscanf’ is declared in header ‘<stdio.h>’
  +++ |+#include <stdio.h>
    1 | int sscanf(long, unsigned[], ...);
pr88886.c:1:5: warning: conflicting types for built-in function ‘sscanf’;
expected ‘int(const char *, const char *, ...)’
[-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
    1 | int sscanf(long, unsigned[], ...);
      |     ^~~~~~
pr88886.c: In function ‘a’:
pr88886.c:2:22: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘sscanf’ from incompatible
pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
    2 | void a() { sscanf(0, ""); }
      |                      ^~
      |                      |
      |                      char *
pr88886.c:1:18: note: expected ‘unsigned int *’ but argument is of type ‘char
*’
    1 | int sscanf(long, unsigned[], ...);
      |                  ^~~~~~~~~~
>From gcc-bugs-return-629510-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 23:16:17 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629510-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 61430 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2019 23:16:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 59789 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2019 23:15:31 -0000
From: "weeks at iastate dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/87939] [F18] Support STAT= and ERRMSG= specifiers to CRITICAL and TEAM statements
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: weeks at iastate dot edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-87939-4-Fa6e4noset@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-87939-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-87939-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02319.txt.bz2
Content-length: 205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939

--- Comment #1 from Nathan Weeks <weeks at iastate dot edu> ---
My bad: END CRITICAL does not accept STAT= or ERRMSG= arguments in Fortran
2018.
>From gcc-bugs-return-629512-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 23:40:11 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629512-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112882 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2019 23:40:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 112783 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2019 23:40:06 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/88881] std::filesystem::status gives bad results on mingw32
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-88881-4-YvOvPCT41W@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88881-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88881-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02321.txt.bz2
Content-length: 435

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88881

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> This bug is the cause of:
> 
> FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc execution test

And also:

FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/temp_directory_path.cc execution test

because GetTempPathW always returns a directory with a trailing slash.
>From gcc-bugs-return-629513-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 23:53:40 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629513-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125943 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2019 23:53:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 125894 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2019 23:53:36 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/88871] [9 regression] ICE segmentation fault in f951
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-88871-4-J4TLMXoyYK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88871-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88871-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02322.txt.bz2
Content-length: 323

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88871

--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 45447
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45447&action=edit
Patch that appears to work

This should fix the linked-list problem.

I'll probably submit tomorrow.
>From gcc-bugs-return-629514-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 16 23:53:53 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629514-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126659 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2019 23:53:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126611 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2019 23:53:49 -0000
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/88871] [9 regression] ICE segmentation fault in f951
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:53:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-88871-4-ULWEmqVLVQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88871-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88871-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02323.txt.bz2
Content-length: 382

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88871

Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
>From gcc-bugs-return-629515-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 00:08:44 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629515-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26941 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 00:08:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26874 invoked by uid 55); 17 Jan 2019 00:08:40 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libbacktrace/82857] libbacktrace: please support binaries stripped with dwz -m (following the .gnu_debugaltlink)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libbacktrace
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-82857-4-LEYukZX5eh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-82857-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-82857-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02324.txt.bz2
Content-length: 640

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82857

--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Jan 17 00:08:05 2019
New Revision: 267996

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267996&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[libbacktrace] Handle DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt

Handle DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt which references the .debug_str section in the
.gnu_debugaltlink file.

2019-01-17  Tom de Vries  <tdevries@suse.de>

        PR libbacktrace/82857
        * dwarf.c (read_attribute): Handle DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt
        using altlink.

Modified:
    trunk/libbacktrace/ChangeLog
    trunk/libbacktrace/dwarf.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-629516-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 00:19:04 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629516-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46958 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 00:19:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 46820 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2019 00:19:00 -0000
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libbacktrace/82857] libbacktrace: please support binaries stripped with dwz -m (following the .gnu_debugaltlink)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libbacktrace
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-82857-4-DChTA24zK0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-82857-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-82857-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02325.txt.bz2
Content-length: 907

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82857

--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #6)
> Author: vries
> Date: Thu Jan 17 00:08:05 2019
> New Revision: 267996
> 
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267996&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> [libbacktrace] Handle DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt
> 
> Handle DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt which references the .debug_str section in the
> .gnu_debugaltlink file.
> 
> 2019-01-17  Tom de Vries  <tdevries@suse.de>
> 
> 	PR libbacktrace/82857
> 	* dwarf.c (read_attribute): Handle DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt
> 	using altlink.
> 
> Modified:
>     trunk/libbacktrace/ChangeLog
>     trunk/libbacktrace/dwarf.c

This is a partial fix. The DW_FORM_GNU_ref_alt part is still to be reviewed:
"[PATCH 7/9] [libbacktrace] Handle DW_FORM_GNU_ref_alt" @
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg00640.html .
>From gcc-bugs-return-629517-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 00:42:57 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629517-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17675 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 00:42:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17557 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2019 00:42:53 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/86308] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple calling an invalid index() declaration
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-86308-4-cy34IAqF2E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-86308-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-86308-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02326.txt.bz2
Content-length: 201

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86308

--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Updated patch for GCC 9:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00969.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-629518-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 00:43:34 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629518-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18816 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 00:43:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18745 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2019 00:43:29 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/88886] [9 Regression] ice in get_constant, at c-family/c-format.c:292
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-88886-4-OZumsr5752@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88886-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88886-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02327.txt.bz2
Content-length: 440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88886

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch

--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Updated patch for GCC 9:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00969.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-629519-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 00:44:41 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629519-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20250 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 00:44:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20102 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2019 00:44:36 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/86125] missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on a mismatched return type
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-86125-4-3LyXDFa79c@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-86125-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-86125-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02328.txt.bz2
Content-length: 422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86125

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch

--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00969.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-629520-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 01:21:10 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629520-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47556 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 01:21:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47519 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2019 01:21:06 -0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/88780] bogus -Wstringop-truncation for copying as many bytes from a string as its length
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-88780-4-kPIn77uWOi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88780-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88780-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02329.txt.bz2
Content-length: 470

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780

Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2019-01-17
                 CC|                            |law at redhat dot com
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
>From gcc-bugs-return-629521-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 01:56:48 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629521-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11888 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 01:56:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10680 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2019 01:56:44 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/88780] [8/9 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation for copying as many bytes from a string as its length
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work short_desc cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-88780-4-6SScnIHgOV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88780-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88780-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02330.txt.bz2
Content-length: 825

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |7.3.0
            Summary|bogus -Wstringop-truncation |[8/9 Regression] bogus
                   |for copying as many bytes   |-Wstringop-truncation for
                   |from a string as its length |copying as many bytes from
                   |                            |a string as its length
      Known to fail|                            |8.2.0, 9.0

--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The Wstringop-truncation warning is new in GCC 8 and is not issued by GCC 7 so
I'm marking this a regression.
>From gcc-bugs-return-629522-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 01:57:41 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629522-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21045 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 01:57:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20823 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2019 01:57:37 -0000
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/88781] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-truncation warnings
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: meta-bug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: version
Message-ID: <bug-88781-4-1PtUEGTSLV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88781-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88781-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02331.txt.bz2
Content-length: 409

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88781

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|9.0                         |8.0

--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
-Wstringop-truncation was first introduced in GCC 8.
>From gcc-bugs-return-629523-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 02:49:39 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629523-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95059 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 02:49:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 94610 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2019 02:49:32 -0000
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/88887] Warn on unexpected continuation of 'return' to new line in if statement.
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 02:49:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc blocked everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-88887-4-99Z26uAjEG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-88887-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-88887-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02332.txt.bz2
Content-length: 811

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88887

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2019-01-17
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
             Blocks|                            |87403
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403
[Bug 87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning
>From gcc-bugs-return-629524-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 03:04:50 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629524-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56522 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 03:04:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56460 invoked by uid 55); 17 Jan 2019 03:04:45 -0000
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/87306] test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pow-1.c fails with its introduction in r263290
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 03:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-87306-4-gLrLtmcoZx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-87306-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-87306-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02333.txt.bz2
Content-length: 650

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87306

--- Comment #3 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: linkw
Date: Thu Jan 17 03:03:38 2019
New Revision: 268003

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:

    PR target/87306
    * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pow-1.c: Modify to reflect that
    the loop is not vectorized on POWER unless hardware 
    misaligned loads are available.

--T his line, and those below, will be ignored--

M    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
M    gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pow-1.c

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pow-1.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-629525-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 03:25:27 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629525-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79077 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 03:25:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 79014 invoked by uid 55); 17 Jan 2019 03:25:22 -0000
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/87306] test case gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pow-1.c fails with its introduction in r263290
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 03:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-87306-4-er7riMDMh7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-87306-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-87306-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02334.txt.bz2
Content-length: 698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87306

--- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: linkw
Revision: 268003
Modified property: svn:log

Modified: svn:log at Thu Jan 17 03:24:27 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Thu Jan 17 03:24:27 2019
@@ -1,10 +1,5 @@
-    
     PR target/87306
     * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pow-1.c: Modify to reflect that
     the loop is not vectorized on POWER unless hardware 
     misaligned loads are available.

---T his line, and those below, will be ignored--
-
-M    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
-M    gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pow-1.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-629526-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jan 17 03:45:58 2019
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-629526-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109407 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2019 03:45:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109269 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jan 2019 03:45:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 testsºYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=warm, Education, H*r:TLS1.0, sustainable
X-HELO: fencepost.gnu.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (209.51.188.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 03:45:48 +0000
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56353)	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)	(Exim 4.82)	(envelope-from <member@cbbjournal.org>)	id 1gjyck-0004hl-Gh	for bug-gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:45:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <member@cbbjournal.org>)	id 1gjycj-0003ca-H7	for bug-gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:45:46 -0500
Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::444]:36293)	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)	(Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <member@cbbjournal.org>)	id 1gjyci-0003aq-S8	for bug-gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:45:45 -0500
Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id u4so9359703wrp.3        for <bug-gcc@gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:45:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Journal member <member@cbbjournal.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 03:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADtqDD76P5DHmUpJy5Z_V+a-hrk34wGt+dszXmuBbO-+CXyV1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Submitting Your Manuscripts
To: bug-gcc@gnu.org
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized.
X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::444
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg02335.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1554

<http://www.ijovs.org/home>
Dear Researcher or Professor,
We publish peer-reviewed international scientific journals devoted to
promoting the development of science and technology. Now we sincerely
invite scholars and researchers to submit papers to the journals or to join
in the editorial board/reviewer team.
Join the Editorial Board/Reviewers Team
In order to expand the editorial board and reviewer group, we would like to
invite you to be our editorial member or reviewer of our journals with
great sincerity. For more details about the Benefits and Responsibilities
of the editorial member or reviewer, please feel free to visit the
following link:
http://www.ijovs.org/journals
Submitting Your Research Paper
We have published 200+ online, peer-reviewed journals. If you have some new
works in your specialized or interested field, welcome to submit your
papers to the corresponding Journals or Special Issues so as to share your
ideas with people around the world.
Journal Lists

   1. American Journal of Chemical Engineering
   2. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
   3. International Journal of Sustainable Development Research
   4. American Journal of BioScience
   5. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
   6. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
   7. International Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
   8. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.
Warm regards,
Jessie Wright


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-16 22:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-22 23:45 [Bug go/56431] New: -lpthread should be added to -lgo hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2013-02-27 14:54 ` [Bug go/56431] " ian at airs dot com
2013-02-27 16:59 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2013-02-27 18:50 ` ian at airs dot com
2013-02-27 19:36 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2013-02-27 21:08 ` ian at airs dot com
2013-02-27 21:21 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2019-01-16 22:32 ` ian at airs dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).